March 4, 2020
Short Spiel on Legal Techlaw’s retrograde rep is more about tech than law
So help me God, that orange-colored website baited me into posting a comment, responding to another user in the broader context of Atrium’s recently announced shutdown of its remaining software-solutions arm.
I’ve never done this before, but I’m going to try reproducing my comment verbatim here. In part because I’d like to read thoughts from others by e-mail. In part because I’ve been thin on legal-tech posts of late, despite doing a lot of work on related projects in free time.
I believed that law was a sluggish, tech-averse industry when I signed up to join it. But I don’t see it living up to its tech-resistant reputation. It’s very easy to blame the customer that way, when you have something to sell. As a lawyer, a coder, and legal toolmaker, I’ve been there. But my lived and observed experience of practice is that lawyers adopt what makes them competitive.
As a result, they’ve often been early, broad adopters of general-purpose office and productivity technology. Sometimes to their eventual detriment overall, by standardizing on an early generation at the expense of later incremental improvements. But at the same time, I think US lawyers as a class are remarkably resistant to whiz-bang pitches of especially law-specific solutions. It’s easy to sell a lawyer some technology that their counterparts are using to run circles around them. It’s hard to sell a lawyer some technology with a change-the-world, techno-solutionist pep talk.
No, I do not recommend signing up for Hacker News. And no, it’s not obligatory reading in the tech sector, though many such goons enjoy it.
more posts about: Law Practice Legal Technology
Your thoughts and feedback are always welcome by e-mail.
back to top — edit on GitHub — revision history